Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
A notice under section 148 issued on 07.04.2022 for A.Y. 2015-16 was treated as time-barred because the first proviso to section 149(1) preserves the limitation applicable to pre-01.04.2021 assessment years. The six-year period under the unamended regime had expired on 31.03.2022, so the amended law could not revive a notice that was already barred. On that basis, the reassessment order founded on the invalid notice was also quashed, and the remaining grounds were left open.
A notice under section 148 issued on 07.04.2022 for A.Y. 2015-16 was treated as time-barred because the first proviso to section 149(1) preserves the limitation applicable to pre-01.04.2021 assessment years. The six-year period under the unamended regime had expired on 31.03.2022, so the amended law could not revive a notice that was already barred. On that basis, the reassessment order founded on the invalid notice was also quashed, and the remaining grounds were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.