Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening under section 147 after a search was upheld, as the tribunal found no infirmity in the assumption of jurisdiction and rejected the challenge to validity of reassessment. On the merits, commission income from an accommodation entry operation was to be estimated at 0.15%, not the higher rate proposed by the Assessing Officer, but the quantification basis was vitiated because the tally data and forensic analysis report had not been confronted to the assessee. That breach of natural justice required fresh computation. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to supply the material, consider the assessee's submissions, recompute turnover, and then apply the 0.15% rate; the Revenue's challenge to that rate was dismissed.
Reopening under section 147 after a search was upheld, as the tribunal found no infirmity in the assumption of jurisdiction and rejected the challenge to validity of reassessment. On the merits, commission income from an accommodation entry operation was to be estimated at 0.15%, not the higher rate proposed by the Assessing Officer, but the quantification basis was vitiated because the tally data and forensic analysis report had not been confronted to the assessee. That breach of natural justice required fresh computation. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to supply the material, consider the assessee's submissions, recompute turnover, and then apply the 0.15% rate; the Revenue's challenge to that rate was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.