Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Infrastructure facility: energy-efficient public lighting held integral to road projects, qualifying the operator as a developer and eligible for dedu...
Fourth Proviso to Section 153A: extended-period inquiry requires a reasonable, material-based satisfaction that escaped income likely exceeds the thre...
Delayed filing of Form No. 67 did not, by itself, justify denial of foreign tax credit; the Tribunal treated the Rule 128 timeline as a directory procedural requirement and directed allowance of the claim subject to verification. The assessee's alternative plea that ESOP perquisites were not taxable in India because of his residential status was not examined on the additional passport and travel material; that issue was remitted for fresh adjudication after factual verification.
Delayed filing of Form No. 67 did not, by itself, justify denial of foreign tax credit; the Tribunal treated the Rule 128 timeline as a directory procedural requirement and directed allowance of the claim subject to verification. The assessee's alternative plea that ESOP perquisites were not taxable in India because of his residential status was not examined on the additional passport and travel material; that issue was remitted for fresh adjudication after factual verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.