Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Delayed filing of Form No. 67 did not, by itself, justify denial of foreign tax credit; the Tribunal treated the Rule 128 timeline as a directory procedural requirement and directed allowance of the claim subject to verification. The assessee's alternative plea that ESOP perquisites were not taxable in India because of his residential status was not examined on the additional passport and travel material; that issue was remitted for fresh adjudication after factual verification.
Delayed filing of Form No. 67 did not, by itself, justify denial of foreign tax credit; the Tribunal treated the Rule 128 timeline as a directory procedural requirement and directed allowance of the claim subject to verification. The assessee's alternative plea that ESOP perquisites were not taxable in India because of his residential status was not examined on the additional passport and travel material; that issue was remitted for fresh adjudication after factual verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.