Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA were held unsustainable where the importer filed an emission certificate issued by an authorised agency, together with Bills of Entry and supporting technical documents, and Customs cleared the goods after verification. The Tribunal found no suppression, concealment, or knowing use of a false or incorrect document, and accepted that the importer acted bona fide in relying on the certificate. The later objection that the certificate was not in the form of a type approval certificate did not establish the ingredients for penalty, so the penalties were set aside.
Penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA were held unsustainable where the importer filed an emission certificate issued by an authorised agency, together with Bills of Entry and supporting technical documents, and Customs cleared the goods after verification. The Tribunal found no suppression, concealment, or knowing use of a false or incorrect document, and accepted that the importer acted bona fide in relying on the certificate. The later objection that the certificate was not in the form of a type approval certificate did not establish the ingredients for penalty, so the penalties were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
