Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA were held unsustainable where the importer filed an emission certificate issued by an authorised agency, together with Bills of Entry and supporting technical documents, and Customs cleared the goods after verification. The Tribunal found no suppression, concealment, or knowing use of a false or incorrect document, and accepted that the importer acted bona fide in relying on the certificate. The later objection that the certificate was not in the form of a type approval certificate did not establish the ingredients for penalty, so the penalties were set aside.
Penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA were held unsustainable where the importer filed an emission certificate issued by an authorised agency, together with Bills of Entry and supporting technical documents, and Customs cleared the goods after verification. The Tribunal found no suppression, concealment, or knowing use of a false or incorrect document, and accepted that the importer acted bona fide in relying on the certificate. The later objection that the certificate was not in the form of a type approval certificate did not establish the ingredients for penalty, so the penalties were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.