Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Writ jurisdiction was not available to challenge a GST assessment when the statutory appeal under Section 107 was the proper remedy and had been allowed to lapse. The SC accepted electronic upload of the assessment order as sufficient communication, rejected the plea of ignorance of the portal notice, and relied on the petitioner's own admission that he became aware earlier but approached the High Court belatedly. On those facts, the writ petition was treated as an impermissible surrogate for appellate proceedings, and interference was declined; the SLP was dismissed.
Writ jurisdiction was not available to challenge a GST assessment when the statutory appeal under Section 107 was the proper remedy and had been allowed to lapse. The SC accepted electronic upload of the assessment order as sufficient communication, rejected the plea of ignorance of the portal notice, and relied on the petitioner's own admission that he became aware earlier but approached the High Court belatedly. On those facts, the writ petition was treated as an impermissible surrogate for appellate proceedings, and interference was declined; the SLP was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
