Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For DGGI-issued GST notices, the notified allocation of powers under Notification No. 02/2017-Central Tax, as amended by Notification No. 02/2022, vested adjudicatory authority in the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner of Central Tax. An order passed by the Assistant Commissioner was therefore without competence and suffered from procedural irregularity, so the adjudication was quashed and remitted for fresh decision by the competent authority after hearing. The merits of the classification dispute and the limitation objection were not examined because the jurisdictional defect was dispositive.
For DGGI-issued GST notices, the notified allocation of powers under Notification No. 02/2017-Central Tax, as amended by Notification No. 02/2022, vested adjudicatory authority in the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner of Central Tax. An order passed by the Assistant Commissioner was therefore without competence and suffered from procedural irregularity, so the adjudication was quashed and remitted for fresh decision by the competent authority after hearing. The merits of the classification dispute and the limitation objection were not examined because the jurisdictional defect was dispositive.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.