Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
For DGGI-issued GST notices, the notified allocation of powers under Notification No. 02/2017-Central Tax, as amended by Notification No. 02/2022, vested adjudicatory authority in the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner of Central Tax. An order passed by the Assistant Commissioner was therefore without competence and suffered from procedural irregularity, so the adjudication was quashed and remitted for fresh decision by the competent authority after hearing. The merits of the classification dispute and the limitation objection were not examined because the jurisdictional defect was dispositive.
For DGGI-issued GST notices, the notified allocation of powers under Notification No. 02/2017-Central Tax, as amended by Notification No. 02/2022, vested adjudicatory authority in the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner of Central Tax. An order passed by the Assistant Commissioner was therefore without competence and suffered from procedural irregularity, so the adjudication was quashed and remitted for fresh decision by the competent authority after hearing. The merits of the classification dispute and the limitation objection were not examined because the jurisdictional defect was dispositive.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
