During pending confiscation proceedings, the HC held that the Form MOV-10 notice was only a proposal and that the adjudicating authority had to decide confiscation after hearing the respondent. The Single Judge's direction to release the goods on a simple bond and the finding that detention was illegal were set aside because final adjudication had not yet occurred. The authority was directed to complete the proceedings expeditiously, after giving an opportunity to produce documents, and all legal issues were left open.
During pending confiscation proceedings, the HC held that the Form MOV-10 notice was only a proposal and that the adjudicating authority had to decide confiscation after hearing the respondent. The Single Judge's direction to release the goods on a simple bond and the finding that detention was illegal were set aside because final adjudication had not yet occurred. The authority was directed to complete the proceedings expeditiously, after giving an opportunity to produce documents, and all legal issues were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
