Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
During pending confiscation proceedings, the HC held that the Form MOV-10 notice was only a proposal and that the adjudicating authority had to decide confiscation after hearing the respondent. The Single Judge's direction to release the goods on a simple bond and the finding that detention was illegal were set aside because final adjudication had not yet occurred. The authority was directed to complete the proceedings expeditiously, after giving an opportunity to produce documents, and all legal issues were left open.
During pending confiscation proceedings, the HC held that the Form MOV-10 notice was only a proposal and that the adjudicating authority had to decide confiscation after hearing the respondent. The Single Judge's direction to release the goods on a simple bond and the finding that detention was illegal were set aside because final adjudication had not yet occurred. The authority was directed to complete the proceedings expeditiously, after giving an opportunity to produce documents, and all legal issues were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.