Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment jurisdiction was upheld because the earlier scrutiny proceedings had already been dropped pursuant to CBDT directions, and the assessee's participation without objection attracted deemed service of notice under section 292BB. The addition for unexplained money was deleted, as earlier cash withdrawals shortly before the redeposit in the same bank account were treated as an available source and the contrary inference was found conjectural. The claim for indexed cost of improvement on sale of house property was remanded for fresh verification, with direction to allow the construction cost if proved. Penalties were adjusted consequentially: the penalty linked to the deleted addition was vacated, the penalty linked to the sustained addition was upheld, and the penalty on the remanded issue was set aside subject to fresh proceedings.
Reassessment jurisdiction was upheld because the earlier scrutiny proceedings had already been dropped pursuant to CBDT directions, and the assessee's participation without objection attracted deemed service of notice under section 292BB. The addition for unexplained money was deleted, as earlier cash withdrawals shortly before the redeposit in the same bank account were treated as an available source and the contrary inference was found conjectural. The claim for indexed cost of improvement on sale of house property was remanded for fresh verification, with direction to allow the construction cost if proved. Penalties were adjusted consequentially: the penalty linked to the deleted addition was vacated, the penalty linked to the sustained addition was upheld, and the penalty on the remanded issue was set aside subject to fresh proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
