Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
On identical facts, the ITAT followed its earlier order and held that the Revenue had failed to establish any permanent establishment in India for the assessee in relation to offshore supply under the ONGC contract. As a result, the offshore supply receipts could not be taxed on a presumptive basis under section 44BB, and the addition was deleted. The Tribunal also noted that the DRP had found the facts unchanged from earlier years; interest and penalty grounds were treated as consequential.
On identical facts, the ITAT followed its earlier order and held that the Revenue had failed to establish any permanent establishment in India for the assessee in relation to offshore supply under the ONGC contract. As a result, the offshore supply receipts could not be taxed on a presumptive basis under section 44BB, and the addition was deleted. The Tribunal also noted that the DRP had found the facts unchanged from earlier years; interest and penalty grounds were treated as consequential.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.