Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
On identical facts, the ITAT followed its earlier order and held that the Revenue had failed to establish any permanent establishment in India for the assessee in relation to offshore supply under the ONGC contract. As a result, the offshore supply receipts could not be taxed on a presumptive basis under section 44BB, and the addition was deleted. The Tribunal also noted that the DRP had found the facts unchanged from earlier years; interest and penalty grounds were treated as consequential.
On identical facts, the ITAT followed its earlier order and held that the Revenue had failed to establish any permanent establishment in India for the assessee in relation to offshore supply under the ONGC contract. As a result, the offshore supply receipts could not be taxed on a presumptive basis under section 44BB, and the addition was deleted. The Tribunal also noted that the DRP had found the facts unchanged from earlier years; interest and penalty grounds were treated as consequential.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.