Timing mismatch in income recognition requires verification whether receipts were already taxed in an earlier year; matter remitted for fresh examinat...
FOB transaction value and export incentives: customs valuation cannot override contractual export benefits or support confiscation without valid proof...
On identical facts, the ITAT followed its earlier order and held that the Revenue had failed to establish any permanent establishment in India for the assessee in relation to offshore supply under the ONGC contract. As a result, the offshore supply receipts could not be taxed on a presumptive basis under section 44BB, and the addition was deleted. The Tribunal also noted that the DRP had found the facts unchanged from earlier years; interest and penalty grounds were treated as consequential.
On identical facts, the ITAT followed its earlier order and held that the Revenue had failed to establish any permanent establishment in India for the assessee in relation to offshore supply under the ONGC contract. As a result, the offshore supply receipts could not be taxed on a presumptive basis under section 44BB, and the addition was deleted. The Tribunal also noted that the DRP had found the facts unchanged from earlier years; interest and penalty grounds were treated as consequential.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.