Section 10A and related deductions: Tribunal rejects separate-undertaking claim, but allows loss set-off, ESOP cost and foreign tax credit in principl...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4201 to 4220 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
On identical facts, the ITAT followed its earlier order and held that the Revenue had failed to establish any permanent establishment in India for the assessee in relation to offshore supply under the ONGC contract. As a result, the offshore supply receipts could not be taxed on a presumptive basis under section 44BB, and the addition was deleted. The Tribunal also noted that the DRP had found the facts unchanged from earlier years; interest and penalty grounds were treated as consequential.
On identical facts, the ITAT followed its earlier order and held that the Revenue had failed to establish any permanent establishment in India for the assessee in relation to offshore supply under the ONGC contract. As a result, the offshore supply receipts could not be taxed on a presumptive basis under section 44BB, and the addition was deleted. The Tribunal also noted that the DRP had found the facts unchanged from earlier years; interest and penalty grounds were treated as consequential.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
