Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
On allotment-based acquisition of immovable property, the holding period was held to run from the allotment date where the allotment letter created substantive enforceable rights and substantial consideration had already been paid, so the transfer was taxable as long-term capital gain. The Tribunal also treated additional evidence as admitted once it had been sent for remand comments and considered on merits, and found a separate refusal to admit it self-contradictory. For the immovable-property addition, it accepted substantial compliance with the banking-channel condition, held that the stamp duty value as on the allotment date was the relevant benchmark, and restored the matter only for limited factual verification of that valuation.
On allotment-based acquisition of immovable property, the holding period was held to run from the allotment date where the allotment letter created substantive enforceable rights and substantial consideration had already been paid, so the transfer was taxable as long-term capital gain. The Tribunal also treated additional evidence as admitted once it had been sent for remand comments and considered on merits, and found a separate refusal to admit it self-contradictory. For the immovable-property addition, it accepted substantial compliance with the banking-channel condition, held that the stamp duty value as on the allotment date was the relevant benchmark, and restored the matter only for limited factual verification of that valuation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
