Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
Regular bail in a GST fake invoicing prosecution turned on whether the material then available conclusively showed the applicant's proprietorship, conscious involvement, or criminal intent in the bogus ITC transactions. The High Court noted that the firm stood in another person's name and that the prosecution relied mainly on investigation statements, inter-firm financial transfers, and surrounding circumstances, which required detailed testing at trial. It also noted that investigation had substantially progressed, documentary and electronic material had been seized, and further custodial interrogation was not necessary. Bail was therefore granted on conditions, without any opinion on the merits.
Regular bail in a GST fake invoicing prosecution turned on whether the material then available conclusively showed the applicant's proprietorship, conscious involvement, or criminal intent in the bogus ITC transactions. The High Court noted that the firm stood in another person's name and that the prosecution relied mainly on investigation statements, inter-firm financial transfers, and surrounding circumstances, which required detailed testing at trial. It also noted that investigation had substantially progressed, documentary and electronic material had been seized, and further custodial interrogation was not necessary. Bail was therefore granted on conditions, without any opinion on the merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.