Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Delay in filing a GST appeal was treated as sufficiently explained where the order had been communicated to the Chartered Accountant, who failed to inform the taxpayer, and the mandatory pre-deposit was treated as substantial compliance with the appellate requirement. The note records that rejecting the appeal only on limitation, without considering the explanation, was viewed as a hyper-technical approach that could make the appellate remedy illusory, so the delay was condoned and the appeal was restored for hearing on merits. It also notes that the existing garnishee recovery, including freezing of bank accounts, was left in place until disposal of the appeal.
Delay in filing a GST appeal was treated as sufficiently explained where the order had been communicated to the Chartered Accountant, who failed to inform the taxpayer, and the mandatory pre-deposit was treated as substantial compliance with the appellate requirement. The note records that rejecting the appeal only on limitation, without considering the explanation, was viewed as a hyper-technical approach that could make the appellate remedy illusory, so the delay was condoned and the appeal was restored for hearing on merits. It also notes that the existing garnishee recovery, including freezing of bank accounts, was left in place until disposal of the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
