Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Input tax credit on QIP-related services was allowed only to the extent the funds were used for repayment or pre-payment of borrowings, because that use was held to be in the course or furtherance of business and incidental to business operations. The authority treated discharge of borrowings as improving liquidity, reducing interest burden, and strengthening business, thereby satisfying the nexus under Section 16(1). ITC was denied for the portion of proceeds invested in the wholly owned subsidiary, since the holding company and subsidiary are distinct legal entities and any benefit to the parent was only indirect, leaving no direct business nexus. The appeal was partly allowed.
Input tax credit on QIP-related services was allowed only to the extent the funds were used for repayment or pre-payment of borrowings, because that use was held to be in the course or furtherance of business and incidental to business operations. The authority treated discharge of borrowings as improving liquidity, reducing interest burden, and strengthening business, thereby satisfying the nexus under Section 16(1). ITC was denied for the portion of proceeds invested in the wholly owned subsidiary, since the holding company and subsidiary are distinct legal entities and any benefit to the parent was only indirect, leaving no direct business nexus. The appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
