Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Eligibility to act as an authorised representative is distinct from eligibility for registration as an Income Tax Practitioner. Section 515 read with Rule 252 governs who may appear as an authorised representative, while Rules 255 to 257 govern entry in the register and grant of a certificate of registration. The one-year practice requirement in Rule 257 applies only to registration; it does not restrict the separate right to appear as a representative. As the applicant had not completed one year's practice on the date of application, and the rule itself was not challenged, the return of the application was held lawful and a fresh application was permitted after completion of the prescribed period.
Eligibility to act as an authorised representative is distinct from eligibility for registration as an Income Tax Practitioner. Section 515 read with Rule 252 governs who may appear as an authorised representative, while Rules 255 to 257 govern entry in the register and grant of a certificate of registration. The one-year practice requirement in Rule 257 applies only to registration; it does not restrict the separate right to appear as a representative. As the applicant had not completed one year's practice on the date of application, and the rule itself was not challenged, the return of the application was held lawful and a fresh application was permitted after completion of the prescribed period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
