Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Tour operator services wholly begun, performed and ended within Jammu and Kashmir were outside the territorial reach of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, because the levy operated only within its territorial limits and the State was excluded from section 64. Planning or booking activity outside the State did not bring the tours into the service tax net when the service was consumed within the excluded territory. The impugned demand was therefore set aside in full, the assessee's appeal was allowed, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Tour operator services wholly begun, performed and ended within Jammu and Kashmir were outside the territorial reach of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, because the levy operated only within its territorial limits and the State was excluded from section 64. Planning or booking activity outside the State did not bring the tours into the service tax net when the service was consumed within the excluded territory. The impugned demand was therefore set aside in full, the assessee's appeal was allowed, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.