Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1781 to 1800 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In GST scrutiny, once ASMT-10 is issued and a reply is filed, the proceedings must proceed to ASMT-12 or to DRC-01A followed by DRC-01; ASMT-13 is confined to non-filers under Section 62, so its use after ASMT-10 and ASMT-11 was procedurally invalid. On that defect, the DRC-07 orders for one registration were set aside, treated as DRC-01 notices, and remitted for de novo adjudication, with the pendency period excluded for limitation. For the other registration, the inspection material justified invocation of the extended period under Section 74, and the writ petitions were dismissed because DRC-01A, DRC-01 and assessment orders were properly issued.
In GST scrutiny, once ASMT-10 is issued and a reply is filed, the proceedings must proceed to ASMT-12 or to DRC-01A followed by DRC-01; ASMT-13 is confined to non-filers under Section 62, so its use after ASMT-10 and ASMT-11 was procedurally invalid. On that defect, the DRC-07 orders for one registration were set aside, treated as DRC-01 notices, and remitted for de novo adjudication, with the pendency period excluded for limitation. For the other registration, the inspection material justified invocation of the extended period under Section 74, and the writ petitions were dismissed because DRC-01A, DRC-01 and assessment orders were properly issued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
