Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
In GST scrutiny, once ASMT-10 is issued and a reply is filed, the proceedings must proceed to ASMT-12 or to DRC-01A followed by DRC-01; ASMT-13 is confined to non-filers under Section 62, so its use after ASMT-10 and ASMT-11 was procedurally invalid. On that defect, the DRC-07 orders for one registration were set aside, treated as DRC-01 notices, and remitted for de novo adjudication, with the pendency period excluded for limitation. For the other registration, the inspection material justified invocation of the extended period under Section 74, and the writ petitions were dismissed because DRC-01A, DRC-01 and assessment orders were properly issued.
In GST scrutiny, once ASMT-10 is issued and a reply is filed, the proceedings must proceed to ASMT-12 or to DRC-01A followed by DRC-01; ASMT-13 is confined to non-filers under Section 62, so its use after ASMT-10 and ASMT-11 was procedurally invalid. On that defect, the DRC-07 orders for one registration were set aside, treated as DRC-01 notices, and remitted for de novo adjudication, with the pendency period excluded for limitation. For the other registration, the inspection material justified invocation of the extended period under Section 74, and the writ petitions were dismissed because DRC-01A, DRC-01 and assessment orders were properly issued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.