Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
In GST scrutiny, once ASMT-10 is issued and a reply is filed, the proceedings must proceed to ASMT-12 or to DRC-01A followed by DRC-01; ASMT-13 is confined to non-filers under Section 62, so its use after ASMT-10 and ASMT-11 was procedurally invalid. On that defect, the DRC-07 orders for one registration were set aside, treated as DRC-01 notices, and remitted for de novo adjudication, with the pendency period excluded for limitation. For the other registration, the inspection material justified invocation of the extended period under Section 74, and the writ petitions were dismissed because DRC-01A, DRC-01 and assessment orders were properly issued.
In GST scrutiny, once ASMT-10 is issued and a reply is filed, the proceedings must proceed to ASMT-12 or to DRC-01A followed by DRC-01; ASMT-13 is confined to non-filers under Section 62, so its use after ASMT-10 and ASMT-11 was procedurally invalid. On that defect, the DRC-07 orders for one registration were set aside, treated as DRC-01 notices, and remitted for de novo adjudication, with the pendency period excluded for limitation. For the other registration, the inspection material justified invocation of the extended period under Section 74, and the writ petitions were dismissed because DRC-01A, DRC-01 and assessment orders were properly issued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
