Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
In GST scrutiny, once ASMT-10 is issued and a reply is filed, the proceedings must proceed to ASMT-12 or to DRC-01A followed by DRC-01; ASMT-13 is confined to non-filers under Section 62, so its use after ASMT-10 and ASMT-11 was procedurally invalid. On that defect, the DRC-07 orders for one registration were set aside, treated as DRC-01 notices, and remitted for de novo adjudication, with the pendency period excluded for limitation. For the other registration, the inspection material justified invocation of the extended period under Section 74, and the writ petitions were dismissed because DRC-01A, DRC-01 and assessment orders were properly issued.
In GST scrutiny, once ASMT-10 is issued and a reply is filed, the proceedings must proceed to ASMT-12 or to DRC-01A followed by DRC-01; ASMT-13 is confined to non-filers under Section 62, so its use after ASMT-10 and ASMT-11 was procedurally invalid. On that defect, the DRC-07 orders for one registration were set aside, treated as DRC-01 notices, and remitted for de novo adjudication, with the pendency period excluded for limitation. For the other registration, the inspection material justified invocation of the extended period under Section 74, and the writ petitions were dismissed because DRC-01A, DRC-01 and assessment orders were properly issued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.