Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Rule 86A permits blocking of input tax credit only when there is adequate material supporting reasons to believe that credit was fraudulently availed or otherwise ineligible, and a revocation representation must be decided by a reasoned speaking order. On the facts discussed, the blockage was sustained because the order recorded that the suppliers lacked physical infrastructure, CCTV verification did not show vehicle movement, and inward slips suggested manipulation of records. The restriction was confined to credit linked to the questioned transactions and was found not disproportionate, though the Revenue was expected to pursue the consequential show-cause and adjudication without delay.
Rule 86A permits blocking of input tax credit only when there is adequate material supporting reasons to believe that credit was fraudulently availed or otherwise ineligible, and a revocation representation must be decided by a reasoned speaking order. On the facts discussed, the blockage was sustained because the order recorded that the suppliers lacked physical infrastructure, CCTV verification did not show vehicle movement, and inward slips suggested manipulation of records. The restriction was confined to credit linked to the questioned transactions and was found not disproportionate, though the Revenue was expected to pursue the consequential show-cause and adjudication without delay.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
