Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
A writ petition challenging three appellate orders was found not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal lay before the Tribunal under the Act. The challenge centred on an alleged insistence on a notarized sale agreement, later said to have been produced, but the court held that this and the related issues required appreciation of facts and law and were therefore for the appellate forum. On that basis, writ jurisdiction was declined and the petitioners were left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.
A writ petition challenging three appellate orders was found not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal lay before the Tribunal under the Act. The challenge centred on an alleged insistence on a notarized sale agreement, later said to have been produced, but the court held that this and the related issues required appreciation of facts and law and were therefore for the appellate forum. On that basis, writ jurisdiction was declined and the petitioners were left to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.