Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Composite GST assessment for more than one tax period was treated as impermissible, following the view that each assessment year requires a separate proceeding once the annual return due date has been reached. Because the challenge was confined to the composite nature of the assessment, the writ was decided on that ground alone and other grounds were left open. The assessment order and the appellate order were set aside, with liberty to commence fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year, and the intervening period was directed to be excluded for limitation.
Composite GST assessment for more than one tax period was treated as impermissible, following the view that each assessment year requires a separate proceeding once the annual return due date has been reached. Because the challenge was confined to the composite nature of the assessment, the writ was decided on that ground alone and other grounds were left open. The assessment order and the appellate order were set aside, with liberty to commence fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year, and the intervening period was directed to be excluded for limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.