Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Composite GST assessment for more than one tax period was treated as impermissible, following the view that each assessment year requires a separate proceeding once the annual return due date has been reached. Because the challenge was confined to the composite nature of the assessment, the writ was decided on that ground alone and other grounds were left open. The assessment order and the appellate order were set aside, with liberty to commence fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year, and the intervening period was directed to be excluded for limitation.
Composite GST assessment for more than one tax period was treated as impermissible, following the view that each assessment year requires a separate proceeding once the annual return due date has been reached. Because the challenge was confined to the composite nature of the assessment, the writ was decided on that ground alone and other grounds were left open. The assessment order and the appellate order were set aside, with liberty to commence fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year, and the intervening period was directed to be excluded for limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
