Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Composite GST assessment for more than one tax period was treated as impermissible, following the view that each assessment year requires a separate proceeding once the annual return due date has been reached. Because the challenge was confined to the composite nature of the assessment, the writ was decided on that ground alone and other grounds were left open. The assessment order and the appellate order were set aside, with liberty to commence fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year, and the intervening period was directed to be excluded for limitation.
Composite GST assessment for more than one tax period was treated as impermissible, following the view that each assessment year requires a separate proceeding once the annual return due date has been reached. Because the challenge was confined to the composite nature of the assessment, the writ was decided on that ground alone and other grounds were left open. The assessment order and the appellate order were set aside, with liberty to commence fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year, and the intervening period was directed to be excluded for limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.