Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Sanctioned GST refund cannot be withheld for administrative delay; balance refund and applicable interest must be paid.
    Penalty under section 270A fails where the exact charge of under-reporting or misreporting is not clearly specified.
    TDS on co-owned property transfers requires no aggregation where each co-owner's share stays below the threshold.
    Faceless reassessment remains valid where section 143(2) notice is issued competently, but merit additions were remanded for fresh verification.
    Shared service cost allocation is deductible where business nexus and reasonable allocation are shown, not one-to-one expense tracing.
    Dividend distribution tax refund denied where DTAA was inapplicable and no return of income supported the claim.
    Penalty under section 271D deleted where sale deed was validly executed through a subsisting GPA before cancellation.
    Classification of rutile ore as ore, not concentrate, defeated duty denial, extended limitation, confiscation and penalty.
    Sole or principal use test upheld for automotive bearing assemblies; classification under motor vehicle parts sustained and penalties set aside.
    Importer status and misdeclaration not proved, but facilitation of improper clearance justified penalties under customs law.
    OLED display module classification: AMOLED assembly for mobile phones fell under tariff item 85249220, not residual parts classification.
    CIRP moratorium bars unilateral appropriation of pre-CIRP security deposits; insolvency claims must follow the resolution process.
    Terminated concession agreement cannot be revived through a resolution plan; parties may still pursue conciliation or arbitration.
    Fraudulent initiation of insolvency proceedings not made out where NOC dispute arose after default and lacked mala fide material.
    Liquidator replacement and related party control under IBC were upheld, with challenge to removal held not maintainable.
    Section 32A IBC limits action against corporate debtor property prospectively, not retrospective provisional attachment already made.
    CENVAT credit on outward transportation turns on place of removal, while ISD distribution does not immunise the recipient from scrutiny.
    Due diligence in audit reporting can itself found professional misconduct, while delayed discipline may justify a reprimand instead of removal.
    Post-conviction compounding in cheque dishonour matters is permitted when settlement is reached and compensation is fully paid.
    Urea import policy extension through Indian Potash Limited continues government-account imports under the State Trading Enterprise framework.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Retrospective deeming of the Assessing Officer for reassessment...

Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedural.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax June 17, 2026 Case Laws AT
Retrospective deeming of the Assessing Officer for reassessment under Sections 148 and 148A was treated as curing the objection based on the identity of the officer, while Section 151A was held to be only enabling and not itself a source of faceless reassessment jurisdiction. The faceless scheme notified on 29.03.2022 applied prospectively to notices under Section 148, so a notice issued earlier could not be attacked for want of faceless jurisdiction at initiation. The later substitution of Section 144B, expressly covering reassessment, was treated as clarificatory and procedural, and omission of the old sub-section 144B(9) meant procedural lapses did not automatically void the assessment. The jurisdictional challenge was rejected; the additions for unexplained investment and cash deposits were restored for fresh examination.

Topics

Acts Income Tax