Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Outstanding receivables from associated enterprises, where they arose from sales transactions already benchmarked under TNMM and a working capital adjustment had been granted, did not justify a separate notional interest adjustment absent evidence of an independent financing arrangement; the adjustment was deleted. CSR-linked donations were not automatically barred from deduction merely because they were made in discharge of CSR obligations, but the claim required verification of recipient eligibility and other statutory conditions, so the matter was remitted. Grounds challenging initiation of penalty proceedings were treated as premature because no final penalty order was under appeal. The treaty-based claim for refund of excess dividend distribution tax was also restored for fresh adjudication.
Outstanding receivables from associated enterprises, where they arose from sales transactions already benchmarked under TNMM and a working capital adjustment had been granted, did not justify a separate notional interest adjustment absent evidence of an independent financing arrangement; the adjustment was deleted. CSR-linked donations were not automatically barred from deduction merely because they were made in discharge of CSR obligations, but the claim required verification of recipient eligibility and other statutory conditions, so the matter was remitted. Grounds challenging initiation of penalty proceedings were treated as premature because no final penalty order was under appeal. The treaty-based claim for refund of excess dividend distribution tax was also restored for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.