Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Transfer pricing comparables for IT support services were adjusted by including Rheal Software Pvt. Ltd. and Toxsl Technologies Private Ltd., as the first was not a persistent loss maker and the second was functionally similar and could be raised before the appellate authority. Unearned revenue shown as customer advances was held not to be unexplained cash credit because the assessee had produced supporting records and the amounts were accepted in later years without adverse material, so the addition was deleted. Foreign exchange fluctuation loss was also deleted since the net exchange difference had already been reflected in the audited accounts and taxable income. Interest and fee were remanded for fresh recomputation after opportunity to the assessee.
Transfer pricing comparables for IT support services were adjusted by including Rheal Software Pvt. Ltd. and Toxsl Technologies Private Ltd., as the first was not a persistent loss maker and the second was functionally similar and could be raised before the appellate authority. Unearned revenue shown as customer advances was held not to be unexplained cash credit because the assessee had produced supporting records and the amounts were accepted in later years without adverse material, so the addition was deleted. Foreign exchange fluctuation loss was also deleted since the net exchange difference had already been reflected in the audited accounts and taxable income. Interest and fee were remanded for fresh recomputation after opportunity to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.