Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Mechanical approval under section 153D vitiates search...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot validate it.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Mechanical approval under section 153D vitiates search assessments where the sanction order shows no examination of the assessment records, issues involved, material relied upon, or reasons for approval across multiple years. The Tribunal treated this as a case of absence of application of mind, not a mere inadequacy of reasons, and held the assessments framed on that basis unsustainable. Section 292BC did not cure the defect because, though made retrospective from 01.04.2021, it could not validate approvals granted earlier. The challenge to the section 153D approval was allowed and the assessments were quashed.
Mechanical approval under section 153D vitiates search assessments where the sanction order shows no examination of the assessment records, issues involved, material relied upon, or reasons for approval across multiple years. The Tribunal treated this as a case of absence of application of mind, not a mere inadequacy of reasons, and held the assessments framed on that basis unsustainable. Section 292BC did not cure the defect because, though made retrospective from 01.04.2021, it could not validate approvals granted earlier. The challenge to the section 153D approval was allowed and the assessments were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
