Limitation for consequential assessments runs from prescribed authority receipt, while verified purchases cannot be disallowed merely for unanswered s...
Higher depreciation for qualifying commercial vehicles, exempt-income disallowance, research deduction verification, and club-expense treatment clarif...
Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Final registration granted on the assessee's original charitable-trust application was treated as relating back to the relevant assessment period, so exemption could not be denied merely because the final order was passed after assessment while provisional registration was already in force. The tribunal noted that the later final registration covered the year in question and upheld exemption for the assessment year. It further held that expenditure on school infrastructure, including repair and construction of classrooms and basic amenities, was allowable as application of income even if capital in nature, and the addition was deleted because the expenditure was genuine and actually incurred.
Final registration granted on the assessee's original charitable-trust application was treated as relating back to the relevant assessment period, so exemption could not be denied merely because the final order was passed after assessment while provisional registration was already in force. The tribunal noted that the later final registration covered the year in question and upheld exemption for the assessment year. It further held that expenditure on school infrastructure, including repair and construction of classrooms and basic amenities, was allowable as application of income even if capital in nature, and the addition was deleted because the expenditure was genuine and actually incurred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.