Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Final registration granted on the assessee's original charitable-trust application was treated as relating back to the relevant assessment period, so exemption could not be denied merely because the final order was passed after assessment while provisional registration was already in force. The tribunal noted that the later final registration covered the year in question and upheld exemption for the assessment year. It further held that expenditure on school infrastructure, including repair and construction of classrooms and basic amenities, was allowable as application of income even if capital in nature, and the addition was deleted because the expenditure was genuine and actually incurred.
Final registration granted on the assessee's original charitable-trust application was treated as relating back to the relevant assessment period, so exemption could not be denied merely because the final order was passed after assessment while provisional registration was already in force. The tribunal noted that the later final registration covered the year in question and upheld exemption for the assessment year. It further held that expenditure on school infrastructure, including repair and construction of classrooms and basic amenities, was allowable as application of income even if capital in nature, and the addition was deleted because the expenditure was genuine and actually incurred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.