Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Where a common adjudication order covers multiple noticees, a Bench should not entertain one noticee's appeal on merits merely because that noticee's office falls within its territorial limits. Applying forum non conveniens and its prior decision, the Tribunal said the proper course was to place the matter before the President under Notification No. 1/2022 for constitution of the appropriate Bench to hear all appeals from the same order, avoiding conflicting decisions, ensuring uniformity of fact and law, and keeping the matter under single High Court supervision.
Where a common adjudication order covers multiple noticees, a Bench should not entertain one noticee's appeal on merits merely because that noticee's office falls within its territorial limits. Applying forum non conveniens and its prior decision, the Tribunal said the proper course was to place the matter before the President under Notification No. 1/2022 for constitution of the appropriate Bench to hear all appeals from the same order, avoiding conflicting decisions, ensuring uniformity of fact and law, and keeping the matter under single High Court supervision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.