Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where a common adjudication order covers multiple noticees, a Bench should not entertain one noticee's appeal on merits merely because that noticee's office falls within its territorial limits. Applying forum non conveniens and its prior decision, the Tribunal said the proper course was to place the matter before the President under Notification No. 1/2022 for constitution of the appropriate Bench to hear all appeals from the same order, avoiding conflicting decisions, ensuring uniformity of fact and law, and keeping the matter under single High Court supervision.
Where a common adjudication order covers multiple noticees, a Bench should not entertain one noticee's appeal on merits merely because that noticee's office falls within its territorial limits. Applying forum non conveniens and its prior decision, the Tribunal said the proper course was to place the matter before the President under Notification No. 1/2022 for constitution of the appropriate Bench to hear all appeals from the same order, avoiding conflicting decisions, ensuring uniformity of fact and law, and keeping the matter under single High Court supervision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.