Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where a common adjudication order covers multiple noticees, a Bench should not entertain one noticee's appeal on merits merely because that noticee's office falls within its territorial limits. Applying forum non conveniens and its prior decision, the Tribunal said the proper course was to place the matter before the President under Notification No. 1/2022 for constitution of the appropriate Bench to hear all appeals from the same order, avoiding conflicting decisions, ensuring uniformity of fact and law, and keeping the matter under single High Court supervision.
Where a common adjudication order covers multiple noticees, a Bench should not entertain one noticee's appeal on merits merely because that noticee's office falls within its territorial limits. Applying forum non conveniens and its prior decision, the Tribunal said the proper course was to place the matter before the President under Notification No. 1/2022 for constitution of the appropriate Bench to hear all appeals from the same order, avoiding conflicting decisions, ensuring uniformity of fact and law, and keeping the matter under single High Court supervision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.