Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1781 to 1800 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rule 22 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 provides that an appeal abates on the death of the appellant unless a successor-in-interest or legal representative applies for continuance within the prescribed framework. In the absence of such an application, proceedings cannot continue against the deceased person. The text also relies on the principle that proceedings cannot be initiated or maintained against a dead person, as this would offend natural justice. The appeal was therefore treated as abated.
Rule 22 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 provides that an appeal abates on the death of the appellant unless a successor-in-interest or legal representative applies for continuance within the prescribed framework. In the absence of such an application, proceedings cannot continue against the deceased person. The text also relies on the principle that proceedings cannot be initiated or maintained against a dead person, as this would offend natural justice. The appeal was therefore treated as abated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.