Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
Pre-commencement R&D deduction denied where business had not commenced; deeming benefit requires tangible start of manufacture or commercial exploitat...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5641 to 5660 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rule 22 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 provides that an appeal abates on the death of the appellant unless a successor-in-interest or legal representative applies for continuance within the prescribed framework. In the absence of such an application, proceedings cannot continue against the deceased person. The text also relies on the principle that proceedings cannot be initiated or maintained against a dead person, as this would offend natural justice. The appeal was therefore treated as abated.
Rule 22 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 provides that an appeal abates on the death of the appellant unless a successor-in-interest or legal representative applies for continuance within the prescribed framework. In the absence of such an application, proceedings cannot continue against the deceased person. The text also relies on the principle that proceedings cannot be initiated or maintained against a dead person, as this would offend natural justice. The appeal was therefore treated as abated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.