Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Limitation for IGST refund claims by specified international organisations was reckoned from 01.08.2019, because Circular No. 23/2019-Customs first clarified that Customs authorities were the competent refund forum. On that basis, the limitation under Notification No. 20/2018-Central Tax was not exhausted when the claims were filed, and the COVID-19 extension of limitation also applied. The claims were therefore treated as within time and not liable to rejection as time-barred.
Limitation for IGST refund claims by specified international organisations was reckoned from 01.08.2019, because Circular No. 23/2019-Customs first clarified that Customs authorities were the competent refund forum. On that basis, the limitation under Notification No. 20/2018-Central Tax was not exhausted when the claims were filed, and the COVID-19 extension of limitation also applied. The claims were therefore treated as within time and not liable to rejection as time-barred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.