Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Section 174(2)(e) of the CGST Act saved investigation, inquiry, assessment, adjudication and other legal proceedings after omission of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. The HC held that this saving clause preserved the authority to institute and continue service tax proceedings as if the earlier law had not been amended or repealed, so a show cause notice issued under the repealed service tax law remained valid. The writ challenge based on repeal was rejected, and the assessee was left to pursue adjudication independently in accordance with law.
Section 174(2)(e) of the CGST Act saved investigation, inquiry, assessment, adjudication and other legal proceedings after omission of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. The HC held that this saving clause preserved the authority to institute and continue service tax proceedings as if the earlier law had not been amended or repealed, so a show cause notice issued under the repealed service tax law remained valid. The writ challenge based on repeal was rejected, and the assessee was left to pursue adjudication independently in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
