Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Section 174(2)(e) of the CGST Act saved investigation, inquiry, assessment, adjudication and other legal proceedings after omission of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. The HC held that this saving clause preserved the authority to institute and continue service tax proceedings as if the earlier law had not been amended or repealed, so a show cause notice issued under the repealed service tax law remained valid. The writ challenge based on repeal was rejected, and the assessee was left to pursue adjudication independently in accordance with law.
Section 174(2)(e) of the CGST Act saved investigation, inquiry, assessment, adjudication and other legal proceedings after omission of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. The HC held that this saving clause preserved the authority to institute and continue service tax proceedings as if the earlier law had not been amended or repealed, so a show cause notice issued under the repealed service tax law remained valid. The writ challenge based on repeal was rejected, and the assessee was left to pursue adjudication independently in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
