Timing mismatch in income recognition requires verification whether receipts were already taxed in an earlier year; matter remitted for fresh examinat...
FOB transaction value and export incentives: customs valuation cannot override contractual export benefits or support confiscation without valid proof...
Section 174(2)(e) of the CGST Act saved investigation, inquiry, assessment, adjudication and other legal proceedings after omission of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. The HC held that this saving clause preserved the authority to institute and continue service tax proceedings as if the earlier law had not been amended or repealed, so a show cause notice issued under the repealed service tax law remained valid. The writ challenge based on repeal was rejected, and the assessee was left to pursue adjudication independently in accordance with law.
Section 174(2)(e) of the CGST Act saved investigation, inquiry, assessment, adjudication and other legal proceedings after omission of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. The HC held that this saving clause preserved the authority to institute and continue service tax proceedings as if the earlier law had not been amended or repealed, so a show cause notice issued under the repealed service tax law remained valid. The writ challenge based on repeal was rejected, and the assessee was left to pursue adjudication independently in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
