Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Section 174(2)(e) of the CGST Act saved investigation, inquiry, assessment, adjudication and other legal proceedings after omission of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. The HC held that this saving clause preserved the authority to institute and continue service tax proceedings as if the earlier law had not been amended or repealed, so a show cause notice issued under the repealed service tax law remained valid. The writ challenge based on repeal was rejected, and the assessee was left to pursue adjudication independently in accordance with law.
Section 174(2)(e) of the CGST Act saved investigation, inquiry, assessment, adjudication and other legal proceedings after omission of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. The HC held that this saving clause preserved the authority to institute and continue service tax proceedings as if the earlier law had not been amended or repealed, so a show cause notice issued under the repealed service tax law remained valid. The writ challenge based on repeal was rejected, and the assessee was left to pursue adjudication independently in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
