Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
A single show-cause notice or composite GST assessment cannot validly cover more than one tax period; where assessment is taken before the annual return due date, the bar applies beyond one month, and after that due date, beyond one year. The assessment and appellate orders were set aside because the challenge was confined to the impermissible clubbing of multiple assessment years. Authorities were left free to start fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year, and the intervening period was directed to be excluded while computing limitation.
A single show-cause notice or composite GST assessment cannot validly cover more than one tax period; where assessment is taken before the annual return due date, the bar applies beyond one month, and after that due date, beyond one year. The assessment and appellate orders were set aside because the challenge was confined to the impermissible clubbing of multiple assessment years. Authorities were left free to start fresh proceedings separately for each assessment year, and the intervening period was directed to be excluded while computing limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.