Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Approval for a trust was upheld because the determinative statutory test was whether expenditure of a religious nature exceeded the prescribed limit of the trust's total income in the relevant year. The Court accepted the Tribunal's finding that the Revenue could not dispute the factual figures showing religious expenditure remained below that limit, so the trust was eligible for approval on that statutory basis despite objections that some objects were religious in nature. The proposed question of law was not entertained, and the appeal was dismissed.
Approval for a trust was upheld because the determinative statutory test was whether expenditure of a religious nature exceeded the prescribed limit of the trust's total income in the relevant year. The Court accepted the Tribunal's finding that the Revenue could not dispute the factual figures showing religious expenditure remained below that limit, so the trust was eligible for approval on that statutory basis despite objections that some objects were religious in nature. The proposed question of law was not entertained, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.