Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
DSCL qualified as a Governmental Authority because it was a government-established special purpose vehicle with 90% or more governmental equity/control and was set up to implement urban local body functions. Its services for the Smart City/ESCO water-supply project to UJS were exempt under Serial No. 4 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) because water supply is a Twelfth Schedule municipal function. The question whether the tripartite arrangement created two distinct supplies was held not maintainable within the questions raised. DSCL was also held not to be a pure agent under Rule 33, so the contractor-related amounts formed part of the value of supply.
DSCL qualified as a Governmental Authority because it was a government-established special purpose vehicle with 90% or more governmental equity/control and was set up to implement urban local body functions. Its services for the Smart City/ESCO water-supply project to UJS were exempt under Serial No. 4 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) because water supply is a Twelfth Schedule municipal function. The question whether the tripartite arrangement created two distinct supplies was held not maintainable within the questions raised. DSCL was also held not to be a pure agent under Rule 33, so the contractor-related amounts formed part of the value of supply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.